A completed close, reviewed by the CFO.
A monthly close executed by the system, then reviewed and locked by the finance lead.
Explore the work →Results
Explore examples of ACTA’s existing finance and automation work. These are specific engagements, each with its own systems, scope, and review requirements.
What matters
The work completed.
The evidence behind it.
The person responsible.
Client examples are anonymized.
A monthly close executed by the system, then reviewed and locked by the finance lead.
Explore the work →Financial statements, lender calculations, and board reporting tied to one set of definitions.
Explore the work →A thirteen-week forecast rebuilt weekly from bank, receivables, payables, and payroll information.
Explore the work →Close
A monthly close executed by the system, reviewed, and locked by the CFO.
Automation supported the close execution. The finance lead retained responsibility for reviewing and locking the results.
A defined close can combine system execution with explicit human accountability.
Reporting
Consolidated financials, lender covenant calculations, and board reporting produced from one set of definitions.
The work tied financial information across reporting outputs so the packages could be reviewed together.
Reporting consistency requires attention to the relationships between outputs, as well as each individual report.
Cash
A thirteen-week cash forecast rebuilt weekly from bank, receivables, payables, and payroll information.
Recurring preparation brings the available information into a forward-looking view for financial review.
A repeatable process can support the finance leader’s assessment of cash needs. A forecast remains an input to judgment.
Start with your business requirements. We will discuss how Discovery can help define the work and infrastructure needed.